According to the Law of Superposition, which statement is accurate?

The Law of Superposition is a fundamental principle in geology and archaeology that states that in any undisturbed sequence of layers (strata), the oldest layers are located at the bottom, while the younger layers are deposited on top. Therefore, the statement that the strata at the bottom are older than those at the top is accurate and aligns with this principle. This foundational concept allows scientists and archaeologists to establish a relative chronological order of events or artifacts found in sedimentary layers, providing insight into the historical context of the materials being studied.

In terms of the other statements, they do not reflect this established principle. The assertion that the strata at the top are older than those at the bottom contradicts the Law of Superposition. The idea that strata between two artifacts are always of equal age is misleading, as layers can vary in age; just because two artifacts are found at similar depths does not mean they are from the same time period. Lastly, the claim that strata is irrelevant to chronological context fails to recognize the critical role that stratigraphy plays in understanding the sequence and timing of historical events.